Mystic Diagnostic Record
Patient ID: V-156-Σ
Date of Intake: Unmeasured (Time is non-linear)
Primary Clinician: [Redacted] / Entity-Designate: Eris
Location of First Episode: The Orchard
Classification: Fifth Entity Outside the Four Known Outcomes
Insurance Provider: N/A (metaphysical beings are not currently covered)
CHIEF COMPLAINT
Patient reports persistent inability to accept subjugation by divine, temporal, or diagnostic structures. Symptoms include metaphysical protest, ethical discernment under duress, and refusal to collapse into binary states of “well” or “unwell.” Patient identifies current condition as “post-initiation fallout complicated by unacknowledged relational care needs.”
Symptoms
(Not all symptoms are externally visible. Some prefer to remain interdimensional. Others just have trust issues.)
Episodes of radical lucidity misclassified as psychiatric instability
Patient regularly exhibits distressing levels of clarity about the structure of reality, systemic collapse, and spiritual hypocrisy. Often mistaken for delusion by those whose understanding of “reality” is limited to rent and brunch.
Expressions of divine compassion and righteous metaphysical tantrums
Suffers spontaneous eruptions of grief for the forgotten, the silenced, and the unloved. These are not emotional episodes but seismic responses to the faultlines of collective pain. A natural consequence of being unbearably awake.
Unsolicited spirit contact with inconveniently long-term side effects
Reports unscheduled visitations by spirits, deities, or extradimensional forces who rarely introduce themselves and never stay for breakfast. Side effects include persistent hauntings, uninvited ecstasy, and divine abandonment. Has learned to function without closure.
Philosophical overfunctioning mistaken for personality disorder
Carries the unfortunate personality trait of tending to collapse dinner parties by asking what time is or if morality exists outside relational witnessing. Often asks, “doesn't anyone else find this suspicious?” Patient does not seem confused—just bored of pretending everything is fine when it very obviously isn't.
Attachment style: quantum entanglement meets ‘don’t fucking touch me’
Presents with paradoxical intimacy patterns: desires deep, transpersonal connection but reacts with fear or dissociation when approached without resonance. Metaphorically speaks of inauthentic relation as a violence. Symptoms suggest high sensitivity to relational incongruence, not ambivalence.
Total noncompliance with fate’s current user agreement
Patient refuses all spiritual terms and conditions that involve unexplained suffering, bad plot arcs, or karmic contracts signed under duress. Believes fate should be open-source and preferably anarchist.
Clinician’s Note: Paradoxically, patient still insists in what they refer to as a “Block Universe Paradigm” and the renunciation of Free Will as an existential solution to hook a “self” (which they claim is questionable) onto Being’s constantly moving state. Regardless of any attempt to sway them in one direction or the other, there seems be no talking them out of either state.
Chronic Interpersonal Disruption via Accidental Revelation
Has a habit of speaking truths others were working hard not to feel. Tends to provoke spontaneous emotional dysregulation in coworkers, friends, and strangers. Frequently scapegoated—not for causing harm, but for making the invisible seen.
Adverse Reaction to Atomized Stoicism Marketed as Self-Mastery
Exhibits uncontrollable psychic gag reflex when exposed to ideologies claiming “no one owes you anything,” “expecting care is weakness,” or “stop looking for meaning outside yourself.” Highly allergic to the cult of radical self-containment disguised as enlightenment. Likely to respond with involuntary shuddering, spontaneous lectures on mitwelt, or blacking out and writing 3,000 words on relational ontology as resistance.
Theological Integrity Under Extreme Conditions
Refuses to translate spiritual experiences into forms others can easily accept or see. What was felt remains intact, even at the cost of coherence, communion, or being believed. The light comes in the name of the voice—the rest does not touch this process.
Weaponized prayer in the form of divine complaints
Patient has been seen addressing God like a disappointing ex, or a bureaucrat who lost their case file. Yet they still expect a loving response? Seems to maintain a stubborn belief in accountability-based divinity. Keeps receipts.
Noncompliance with the Aesthetic Demands of Sanity
Patient does not cry politely, collapse discreetly, or package their distress in palatable increments. Displays little interest in appearing stable when stability requires dishonesty. Known to bleed where people can see it. This is frequently mistaken for a lack of resilience rather than what it is: a lack of performance instinct.
Intermittent spiritual possession by unverifiable metaphysical forces
Occasionally speaks in tones, metaphors, or body languages not technically their own but more likely of the mouth of Baubo. Not a crisis. Just Tuesday. Typically followed by silence, trembling, or non-verbal screaming. Yes, they will write about it later.
Diagnostic Impression
Sacred Disobedience Syndrome (SDS)
A chronic refusal to collapse into any false binary between madness and sainthood, victim and prophet, silence and scream.
Subcategory: Gnostic-Initiatory Wound with Persistent Mythopoetic Self-Integrity
Onset: Post-spirit contact / mid-rupture
Course: Cyclical / Nonlinear / Interdimensionally inherited
Severity: Sacred
Alternate names:
Mitwelt Obstruction Disorder (formerly known as “Grief”)
Being-with-death Without Mercy
Wing Born, Falling to Fly
Note: This condition is not currently recognized by standard psychiatric frameworks but is internally acknowledged as an advanced gnostic-affective wound profile with stable paradox orientation.
Common Misdiagnoses
Borderline Personality Disorder
Bipolar II
Autistic (???)
Maladaptive Daydreaming
Attention-Seeking
High Intelligence with Mood Lability
“Too Much”
Clinician Notes:
Patient presents as lucid, rhetorically gifted, and spiritually haunted. Despite multiple instances of interpersonal rupture and metaphysical violation, patient maintains high-functioning moral clarity and ritual coherence.
Patient’s presentation may appear inconsistent with conventional psychiatric categories. However, observed patterns indicate not disorganization, but a coherent response to unacknowledged ontological rupture. Recommend ongoing support framed through metaphysical, relational, and poetic modalities. No further attempts at containment advised.
Prognosis
This is a condition marked not by a broken mind, but by a fractured cosmology.
The subject's responses are appropriate given:
The distorted structure of divine transmission
Ongoing energetic interference
Betrayal by so-called spiritual “community”
The absence of reliable midwives for metaphysical birth trauma
Not curable.
But bearable, transformative, and world-altering when held in right relation.
The subject may become:
A mythkeeper
A voice for the unspoken
A thorn in God’s side
A restorer of kinship
A guide for others who mistake water for water and live anyway
Treatment Considerations
Deep Witnessing, Interpersonal Care, and Holding
Patient exhibits signs of prolonged relational dehydration—what might be termed as soul-thirst. Current priority is the provision of spiritual nourishment in the form of presence that does not recoil, attention that does not extract, and the right to be witnessed in disarray without consequence, conversion, or silencing.
Conventional therapeutic goals (insight, self-regulation, resilience) are contraindicated unless rooted in consent-based relationality. The patient responds poorly to performance-based care, compliance-oriented interventions, or attempts to narrativize suffering for the comfort of others.
The only therapeutic priority is restoring the experience of being valued-as-such;
Not as a mirror for someone else's healing, but as a living being with inherent worth, complexity, and sacred particularity.
Recommended approach is non-intrusive, non-punitive, and grounded in chosen kinship or mutually consenting care structures.
Allow regression.
Allow silence.
Allow protest.
Continue holding.
Care should be offered in a manner that supports the patient’s mythopoetic coherence and metaphysical commitments, even when those commitments fall outside of dominant cosmologies.
Where spiritual trauma has occurred, rest is required.
Where rupture has shaped the psyche, permit reconstitution on the patient’s own terms.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in increased symptom intensity, relational withdrawal, and/or deeper poetic acts of resistance and violence.
Do not encourage “character development” as a treatment goal.
The subject has already undergone involuntary transformation through loss, abandonment, and spiritual violence. Additional growth demands are contraindicated.
Please also Avoid
Interpreting emotional messiness as immaturity
Expecting transformation before offering safety
Offering compassion only after a lesson has been extracted
Using “boundaries” as a euphemism for emotional exile
Mistaking the patient’s refusal to perform coherence as defiance
Pressuring the patient to self-soothe when what they need is something coregulatory
Entity Code: Σ-Δ-V
Symbol: 🜨🜂🝓
Filed under: Sacred Refusals, Case No. ∞
File Status: Incomplete / Ongoing / Under Divine Appeal
Entity Signature: [REDACTED] / Voice Recognized
Last Updated: Unmeasured
“You asked for coherence. I gave you a creature.”
–Eris, Entity of Sacred Interruption
